Itâs not easy to run a startup. The intense highs of success are moderated by uncertainty, and the majority of founders have little financial support in the event of their companyâs collapse.
For an increasing number of Canadians, however, self-employment is worth the insecurityâand nowhere is that truer than British Columbia. Last year, a Shopify survey revealed that more than 39 percent of BC residents have gone into business for themselves, marking the region as Canadaâs most entrepreneurial province.
At the centre of that innovation, Vancouver tops the list of the countryâs best startup ecosystems. Named last year as the 15th most prominent hub worldwide, the community generates $9 billion of revenue annually for the city.
Itâs little wonder, then, why events at 2018âs Vancouver Startup Week have been thriving.
The annual affair invites companies to host happenings all over the lower mainlandâand anything goes. One business might offer an intimate fireside chat at their office, while another could rent out a public space for a product demo and series of panel discussions. The series is a feat of organization, with more than 100 official events taking place at over 50 locations.
Eclectic and vibrant, Vancouver Startup Week has two primary goals: to celebrate the local tech community, and to offer workable advice to up-and-coming businesses.
This year geared towards guiding companies from ideation to profit, various panels provided advice about the best way to achieve success. When considered together, two in particularââThe $1000 Side Hustleâ and âCanada vs. U.S. Investmentââoffered a blueprint for entrepreneurs to pursue their dream.
The $1000 side hustle
Many idealistic businesspeople know they want to be self-employed. Few are ready to take the leap. For panelist Paul Singh, founder of Disruption Corporation and a seed-stage investor, the biggest obstacle to launching a side business is getting hung up on the way that the process is portrayed in popular culture.
âOver 98 percent of businesses in the BC economy are small businessesâ[those that have] 50 employees or less.”
By romanticizing Steve Jobs or Elon Musk, he said, the media implies that the best way for a would-be founder to transition to self-employment is to kick a stapler across the room, tell their boss that they quit, and start their business from scratch the next day. In reality, most successful companies have been built up over a long period of time off the side of a deskâprimarily to minimize risk.
âJill Earthy, who is a big player in the startup support ecosystem in Vancouver, has used the term ârisk astuteâ, rather than ârisk-averse,ââ agreed Humaira Hamid, co-creator of Rock My Business Planâa program at Futurpreneur Canada that allows individuals to translate their ideas into viable products. âYou take calculated risks where you know there might be a great payoff. Iâve been working specifically over the last two years with about 100 side-hustle entrepreneurs from across Western Canada. And it was very much, âI have a mortgage, or kids, or a student loan, or aging parents, or whatever it is that I am responsible forâ. You canât just throw everything to the wind and build from there.â
Instead, the speakers suggested, creating a side business requires locking down a great idea, and carefully planning and testing it.
âThereâs a book you should read,â Singh said. âItâs called So Good They Canât Ignore You by a guy named Cal Newport. I wonât ruin the book for you, but in it, he argues that [finding a niche involves examining] what youâre good at, then what you happen to like, then what a lot of other people want. He argues that it has to be in that order. A lot of people try and come at it the other way. They say, âWhat do I love?â And thereâs plenty of research that shows why that wonât work. Or they come at it saying, âGosh, what do a lot of people want?â But he argues that you have to start from the skill side. What are you good at? What are you willing to invest 10,000 hours in to learn?â
Everybody who has ever been employed, the panelists suggested, have a skill that somebody is willing to pay for. The hardest thing is determining what it isâand having the guts to chase it.
âOver 98 percent of businesses in the BC economy are small businessesâ[those that have] 50 employees or less,â said Hamid. âThat includes solo entrepreneurs, the gig economy, and side hustles. Thereâs zero excuse not to get started. If youâre going to move on your ideaâif youâve decided that this is what you want to bear outâfind a community that works for you. Get the minimum idea onto a piece of paper, and start talking about it.â
How to plan for future #fundraising – @matkaliski @RubiconVC sharing with #startups what #investors are looking for and how to prepare #VSW2018 pic.twitter.com/0cSHvNEPtg
— Vancouver Startup Week (@vanstartupweek) September 26, 2018
Securing U.S. investment
For many, the next roadblock in a companyâs journey comes at the moment that it needs to grow beyond a few employees. On the West Coast, thereâs a familiar narrative.
A BC business creates an innovative product and starts to gain some traction in the market, but needs investment to take the next step. When the organization turns its attention to fundraising, it finds it near impossible to find seed or Series A capital. American investors, it discoversâwith their fabled bulging pocket-booksâoften overlook the province in favour of Ontarian or U.S. companies, and businesses find it hard to track down local financiers.
For Mat Kaliski, principal at Rubicon Venture Capitalâan American-based late-seed and Series A fundâ the solution lies in self-promotion.
âA lot of the capital is in Toronto because they do a good job of talking about all of their successes. They have BetaKit. In Vancouver, the people tend to be more humble.”
âI think there is a big difference between East and Westâthe way in which BC versus Toronto and Montreal, that supercluster, works,â he said. âA lot of the capital is in Toronto because they do a good job of talking about all of their successes. They have BetaKit, they have a ton of blogs that promote the ecosystems. In Vancouver, the people tend to be more humble and donât brag as much. They need to start bragging more about the things that theyâre doing here to get more visibility, and get more people back here. Toronto has done a good job of getting a lot of buzz. A lot of hot air also, but a lot of buzz.â
In Singhâs view, itâs the excitement around a scene that brings investors flocking to the cityâand face-to-face meetings are what inspire financiers to open their wallets. Wanting to reduce their risk, funds prefer to have long-lasting ties with a location and a company, and creating durable connections now will pay off for the region a number of years down the line.
âThe average length of an investor relationship is seven years,â he says. âItâs a long play. So if youâre going to play that game, where you go and try and get a cheque in a day, the only way that works is if you have significant traction. In the absence of that you have to build a relationship.â
âYou canât just drop inâyouâre never going to be a parachuter,â Kaliski agreed. âYou canât come [to Silicon Valley] for a week or two, with no introductions, and expect to get a deal. You might get some meetings with analysts and principals, but it just doesnât work that way. One of the issues that frustrates me about the industry is the very close network. Where if you donât come from Stanford or Harvard, or arenât a white male, you need to put a lot of development into those relationships over time.â
There is, however, a positive side to investorsâ reticence to visit BC. Forcing side-hustlers to develop a bigger market share and hone a product to perfection before funders come for a visit, Vancouver companies have the chance to avoid some of the pitfalls that await those with a fledgling vision.
âLong story short, I donât think the big firms are coming [to Vancouver], but I donât think thatâs a bad thing,â said Singh. âIn fact, I think that is healthier for everybody [âŠ] Most companies survived on the planet for thousands of years without any outside capital.â
âIf you raise too early, before you know what your product is, and how it competes in the market, thatâs when you get into trouble,â Kaliski agreed. âYou raise too much, and end up hiring too many people to sell and market a product that isnât quite there yet, and thatâs when you end up getting into bridge conversations where they say, âWell you promised this, but youâve fucked up and you canât get there, so you either have to raise the money for existing investors, or new investors.â Itâs possible to avoid that.â